Chapter 4 : Metaphysics
Metaphysics deals with what is real. What do all things that are real, in some way or in any way, have in common that makes them real and not otherwise?
Have you ever heard or said any of the following:
Well, just what is meant by "real"? If all things that are real
constitute "reality" , then what is "reality"? What does it mean to be real?
Is there a reality? How
would we know it?
This is the stuff of metaphysics. When someone dies and a survivor wonders whether or not souls are real they are entering into metaphysical thinking as soon as they begin to think about what exactly it means to be real.
objects are real. Or at least most people think that they are real. Ideas are real. Relationships (taller than,
older than) are real. They are all real but they are not real in the
same way. What do they have in common that makes them real? You
check out something to determine whether or not it is real. A
testing process is used. The testing involves the use of the senses,
physical objects and measuring devices. But are all things that are
real detectable by means of such physical devices? This is a
Metaphysics is a branch of Philosophy that could be of significance to humans as they must deal with claims about things and state of affairs about which they wonder, "Are they real or not?" At the beginning of the Twenty First Century Philosophers are exploring alternatives to the post modernist view that would restore some notion of there being a reality. It is too soon to discern which traditions in Philosophy may reassert themselves and in what form to displace the discredited postmodern rejection of the idea of a single reality.
At the beginning of the twentieth century there was a movement in Philosophy called linguistic analysis that held that most, if not all, of the most basic problems confronting philosophers and humans were the result of language problems and once they were solved with a method of clarification the human problems would be solved as well. This has not proven to be the case. Some but not all of the problem with the idea that there are "multiple realities" may very well be a problem with language and the sloppiness with which people use it.
Let's consider the idea of "multiple realities". At first glance many will agree that there are multiple realities. But when asked exactly what is meant by that claim there are different ideas. There is a need to clarify the meaning of the term "reality". As with many words there is more than one meaning and to switch from one to another in a conversation or an argument is to invite problems. In Philosophy this problem is known as equivocation.
VIEW: Multiple Realities and Multiple Meanings
Reality1= the sum total of all that is real.
By this is meant the total sum of all things that exist and are experienced no matter what or where they are. These would be real things meaning as opposed to imaginary or illusory.
Now there is a universe and it is composed of galaxies and they are composed of solar systems and they have planets and moons and then there are asteroids and comets and throughout it all there is dark matter and energy and dark holes and the forces of the universe: gravity, electro-magnetic, strong and weak. This universe occupies and constitutes space. It has three dimensions of length, breadth and depth. Add the dimension of time and the entire space-time continuum is reality1. Thus reality1 is the total of all real things that are space-time continuum.
Now if there should be more dimensions than the four of the known space-time continuum, well then reality1 would consist of the sum of all those dimensions. String theory holds for many more dimensions than the four of space-time. If there should be other universes with their own galaxies and solar systems, etc... then reality1 would be the total of all those universes and dimensions.
Reality1 is singular. There is only one reality1. Whatever is real and exists makes for reality1.
It is obvious that the experiences of different people are different and the more different people are so are their experiences and so is their reality2. So in the sense of reality2 there are multiple realities2.
Rich people have a different reality2 then poor people. Tall people have a different reality2 than short people. Males have a different reality2 than females and so on.
As different people have different beliefs about what
is real then they have a different reality3.
So with MEANING2 and MEANING 3 there are multiple "realities"
If in metaphysics the issue is "What is real?" then they meaning of the word “real” and the resulting “reality“ would be the sense of the word using the meaning of reality1.
Now with post-modernism there came the notion that since humans do not know with objective knowledge and with absolute certainty what reality1 is then all thinking about reality1 is merely about reality3. Thus, different groups of people have different beliefs about reality1 and thus there being no set of beliefs that are certain to be true and complete knowledge of reality1 then there is no reality1 that humans know and all talking about reality1 is merely talking about reality3 and thus there can be and are multiple realities3 and that is all that humans can do.
Post modernism presents the claims:
There is no absolute certainty about reality1.
There can be no certain knowledge of reality1.
There can be no objective knowledge of reality1.
All thinking about reality1 is done within groups by individuals and amounts to no more than reality3.
So, there are only multiple realities3.
Is this actually the case that there is no reality1 and
there are only realites3?
Some think that there is.
To begin with we start out with there being only one such planet on which we who are writing and reading or listening to these words are living.
If each of us has his or her own planet earth then there is no explanation as to why we are each on the other's planets.
So we agree that there is ONE PLANET EARTH.
So in reality1 the planet earth has one and only one
Are they equally correct? No, they could both be
wrong. This could happen if the one and only planet earth turned out to have a pyramid shape or
some other shape beside a spheroid or flat saucer like entity. But the people who think it is
flat and those who think it is an oblate spheroid can not both be correct at
the same time.
It would be foolish (defying logic and basic reason) to claim that there are multiple realties using reality1 meaning. It would be obvious to claim that there are multiple realities about the shape of the earth using reality3 meaning.
So where are we with all this talk about reality and multiple realities? Well the American Pragmatist Charles Sanders Peirce wished to distinguish himself from the other pragmatists because of a few points of fundamental difference with them. Most held that there was no reality1 and Peirce held that there was such a reality1 and that humans would develop better and better understandings of just what reality1 is but never capture it totally and completely. He wished that his own form of pragmatism that held out for such a thing to be known as "pragmaticism" but that did not catch on. So we have the post modernism of Peirce and then the post modern relativism of the others including pragmatists who want to claim that there is no reality1.
It seems that Peirce was more accurate than those others who would go on to promulgate many ideas about the lack of certainty and the impossibility of objective knowledge and truth.
The shape of the planet earth is something that humans come to know. Their thinking about is checked against they way that things are. There is a method for checking on the empirical claims of human beings and that method is self correcting. Science develops over time a better and better understanding of the nature of things and of reality1.
We should not accept that there are multiple realities1 but only that there are multiple realities in the sense of meaning 2 (reality2) and meaning 3 (reality3). We would do better to stop using those meanings and to speak more clearly and when we want to claim that there are multiple realities in the sense of meaning 2 (reality2) and meaning 3 (reality3) we should make these claims:
b) There are different experiences of what is real.
and not say that there are different realities when all we mean by that is either b) or c).
From the website:
Definition of Metaphysics
These are these three sub divisions of Metaphysics:
SELECTED TOPICS in
One of the earliest and elaborate scheme of Metaphysics was established by Aristotle: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.html
The following Schools of
thought or traditions of thought in Metaphysics will be examined in the
A. MATERIALISM: ALL
THINGS THAT EXIST ARE MADE OF MATTER IN SOME WAY
B. IDEALISM: ALL
THINGS THAT EXIST ARE IDEAS IN SOME MIND
C. DUALISM: ALL THINGS THAT
EXIST ARE EITHER MATTER OR SPIRIT SEPARATE SUBSTANCES
D. POST MODERN THEORIES
NO ONE REALITY -Multiple Realities
|These views will be described in the following sections of this chapter..|
Proceed to the next mini lecture by clicking here> next section.
|Return to: Table of Contents for the Online Textbook|